An investor in Shanghai, China, invested 1.05 million yuan in virtual currency. After encountering platform withdrawal issues, they sued the court for compensation, but the court dismissed their claim.

BlockBeats News, February 13 — The People’s Court of Jing’an District, Shanghai, China, recently heard a case involving an improper profit-taking dispute caused by virtual currency investment. Ms. Wu was persuaded by a live stream host to invest 1.05 million yuan in virtual currency trading. After being unable to withdraw funds from the platform, she filed a lawsuit seeking compensation. However, her claims were dismissed in both the first and second trials, and she was ultimately responsible for bearing all losses herself. This final judgment serves as a warning to all investors who indulge in wishful thinking and blindly engage in virtual currency speculation.

In November 2019, Ms. Wu received a sales call and, under the guidance of a live stream investment host, downloaded a virtual currency trading app. Through this platform, Ms. Wu made successive investments totaling 1.05 million yuan, reaching agreements with eight sellers, including a transaction of 80,000 yuan with Mr. He. Later, Ms. Wu discovered that she could not log into the trading app, and the virtual currency worth 1.05 million yuan in her account on the platform could not be withdrawn.

In 2024, Ms. Wu reported the incident to the local public security authorities and filed a civil lawsuit in court, claiming that Mr. He should return the 80,000 yuan transaction amount on the grounds of improper profit. Mr. He argued that he was a member of a certain digital trading platform, was selling USDT digital currency through order placement, had not registered an account on the platform Ms. Wu referred to, and that the transaction was completed after the funds were received, so there was no improper profit.

After review, the Shanghai Jing’an District People’s Court held that, according to the relevant provisions of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China, civil subjects engaging in civil activities must not violate laws or violate public order and good morals. In this case, the USDT involved is a virtual currency, which does not have the same legal status as legal tender. Activities related to virtual currency are considered illegal financial activities. Ms. Wu’s investment transactions involve virtual currency-related business activities, and trading virtual currency disrupts the national financial regulatory order, violating public order and good morals, and constitutes an invalid civil legal act. The losses arising from this should be borne by her alone. In conclusion, the Jing’an District People’s Court dismissed all claims filed by plaintiff Ms. Wu. Dissatisfied with the judgment, Ms. Wu appealed. After review, the second-instance court dismissed the appeal and upheld the original ruling.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Criticized for freezing too slowly: USDC freezes are taking too long! Circle CEO: We will definitely wait for a court order before freezing; we refuse to freeze it on our own

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire said the company will not proactively freeze wallet addresses unless it receives a court order or law-enforcement requirement. Even amid allegations of hacker money laundering and community backlash, Circle continues to insist on operating under the rule of law. Jeremy Allaire sets Circle’s law-enforcement bottom line ----------------------------- As the global cryptocurrency market surges with uncertainty, Circle’s CEO Jeremy Allaire, at a press conference in Seoul, South Korea, made a clear stance on the market’s most sensitive issue of “asset freezes.” He noted that while Circle has technical means to freeze specific wallet addresses, unless it receives a court order or an official directive from law-enforcement agencies, the company will not

CryptoCity11h ago

Criticized for freezing USDC too slowly! Circle CEO: We will definitely wait for the court’s order before freezing—refusing to freeze privately/by ourselves without authorization

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire said the company will not proactively freeze wallet addresses unless it receives a court order or a request from law enforcement. Even amid hacker money-laundering disputes and community backlash, Circle still insists on operating in accordance with the rule of law. Jeremy Allaire sets Circle’s law-enforcement bottom line ----------------------------- As the global cryptocurrency market roils, Circle’s CEO Jeremy Allaire, the stablecoin issuer, delivered a clear stance on the most sensitive issue in the market at a press conference in Seoul, South Korea. He pointed out that although Circle has the technical means to freeze specific wallet addresses, unless it receives a court order or a formal instruction from law-enforcement authorities, the company will not take such action on its own.

CryptoCity15h ago

Attacker Exploiting Bridged Polkadot Vulnerability Transfers $269K to Tornado Cash

On April 15, Arkham reported that the attacker who exploited a Bridged Polkadot vulnerability transferred around $269,000 in stolen funds to Tornado Cash, complicating asset tracking.

GateNews15h ago

Is it possible that using a credit card to buy crypto could bypass Financial Supervisory Commission regulations? Odlinting is promoting Wallet Pro, a U.S. debit card crypto-buying service

The OwlPay and Wallet Pro services launched by OdinTing use stablecoin technology to enable B2B cross-border payments, and partner with international payment giants to demonstrate its ambition to expand in the fintech space. By operating from abroad, OdinTing bypasses Taiwan’s regulatory restrictions to provide fast virtual-asset trading. Meanwhile, facing the newly promulgated Virtual Asset Services Act, it is expected in the future to become a reference template for other foreign-invested companies entering the Taiwan market.

CryptoCity16h ago

Zerion Hot Wallet Loses $100K in AI-Driven Social Engineering Attack by North Korea-Linked Hackers

Zerion confirmed a recent AI-driven social engineering attack by North Korean hackers, resulting in a $100,000 loss from corporate hot wallets. User funds remain safe, and the company has taken precautionary measures. This follows another significant attack on Drift Protocol.

GateNews17h ago

Criticized for freezing USDC too slowly! Circle CEO: We will definitely wait for a court order to freeze it—refusing to freeze it on our own

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire said that unless it receives a court order or a law-enforcement request, the company will not proactively freeze wallet addresses. Even amid disputes over hackers allegedly laundering money and backlash from the community, Circle remains committed to operating in accordance with the rule of law. Jeremy Allaire sets Circle’s law-enforcement bottom line ----------------------------- As developments surge across the global cryptocurrency market, at a press conference in Seoul, South Korea, Circle’s CEO Jeremy Allaire took a clear stance on the most sensitive issue in the market—“asset freezes.” He noted that while Circle has the technical means to freeze specific wallet addresses, unless it receives a court order or an official instruction from law-enforcement agencies, the company does not

CryptoCity18h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments