The first four lessons treated stablecoins as cash and credit layers; in reality, many products attract funds with "stablecoin investment," "stable yield," or "annualized X%." Lesson 5 clarifies two things: the underlying stablecoin versus the yield strategies built on top; many losses aren't caused by "USD depegging," but by stacking one or more additional layers of risk on top of stablecoins. This section does not evaluate any specific protocols; it only provides a classification of yield sources and a framework for risk layering, making it easier to read product documentation and news.
Bank deposit interest comes from a bank's asset-side returns and policy rates, with regulatory frameworks and deposit insurance (varying by country).
DeFi or platform-based "stablecoin yields" usually come from:
Lending spreads (someone borrows stablecoins and pays interest);
Trading fees (LPs provide liquidity);
Token incentives (extra governance tokens issued);
Real-world asset yields (underlying RWA products);
Project subsidies (treasury income or project's own funds);
Or combinations of the above.
Therefore, the displayed APR/APY is a strategy return, not an issuer's promise to maintain $1 face value. Higher yields often mean taking on one or more additional layers of risk (credit, contract, collateral volatility, liquidity, governance, etc.).
Deposit stablecoins into a lending protocol, lend to collateralized borrowers, earn interest.
Yield source: Borrowing rate − protocol take rate;
Main risks: Collateral value crash leading to bad debt/liquidation failure; protocol vulnerabilities; stablecoin depegging causing confusion between collateral and debt; governance parameter errors.
Pair stablecoins with other assets (often another stablecoin or ETH) in a DEX pool to earn trading fees + incentive tokens.
Yield source: Fees, mining rewards;
Main risks: Impermanent loss (IL); depegging of a stablecoin in the pool causing imbalance; sharp drop in returns after incentives end; smart contract risk.
Automatically deploys funds into multiple strategies (looped lending, LP restaking, leverage).
Yield source: Combination of underlying strategies;
Main risks: All underlying risks stacked + aggregator contract risk + friction during strategy switching; lower transparency makes it harder for holders to see real-time exposure.
Operated by exchanges or partner institutions, displaying annualized yields on stablecoins.
Yield source: May include lending, market making, on-chain strategies, RWA, etc. (disclosure varies by platform);
Main risks: Counterparty credit, terms changes, redemption suspension, black-box risk controls differing from on-chain protocols.
A "layer cake" model can be used to record exposures:
Key phrase when reading product materials: If the documentation states "principal is stable" or "pegged to USD," ask: which layer is stable? It's often just the face value of the L0 stablecoin, not "the net value will never fluctuate after deposit."
Deposit stablecoins and receive interest-bearing receipt tokens; balance increases over time. Essentially shares of a lending pool; risk lies in pool health and contract safety.
Dual-stable pools have low IL as long as both sides remain pegged; if depegging occurs, arbitrage drains strong assets, forcing LPs to hold weaker assets and magnifying losses.
Use stablecoins as collateral to borrow more stablecoins for yield strategies—amplifies both yield and liquidation risk (different layer than CFD/perpetual course leverage logic, but both are margin-based thinking).
Reinvest interest-bearing receipt tokens into new protocols for potentially higher yields; failures can trigger rapid chain reactions (L4 layer).
Underlying assets may be government bonds, private credit, etc.; yield comes from real-world assets—risks include credit, liquidity, legal, and custody risks—not fully equivalent to on-chain overcollateralized DAI logic.
Some tokens with USD in their names may be algorithmic or partially collateralized, using incentives to maintain high APR—refer back to Lesson 2's mechanism classification; don't assume any token with USD in its name is an L0 stablecoin.
Many protocols display extremely high annualized rates—partially from extra governance token emissions. Features:
Actual USD yield may be far lower than headline APR;
If reward token price falls, effective yield drops sharply;
After incentives end, funds exit and strategy capacity collapses.
Teaching principle: distinguish between "sustainable yield" and "subsidy yield"—the former mostly from borrowing interest and real fees; the latter depends on token inflation and market demand.
When a stablecoin (L0) depegs, upper-layer strategies may see:
Lending protocols: confusion between collateral and debt pricing, liquidation spikes;
LP pools: depegged coins dumped, pool nears single-sided;
Aggregators: strategy NAV drops, redemption congestion;
Centralized products: subscription/redemption paused or rates adjusted.
Thus, the depeg monitoring covered in Lesson 3 is equally critical for DeFi users—not only those holding spot stablecoins need to care about the peg.
Before considering any "stablecoin investment," try to answer:
What type of stablecoin underlies it (L0 mechanism)?
Which main category does the yield come from: A/B/C/D?
Are smart contracts audited? Any historical incidents?
Are there lock-up periods, redemption delays, gateway limits?
Is leverage or restaking used?
How much of the APR comes from token incentives?
If the underlying stablecoin depegs by 2%, how much might the strategy's NAV fall?
Is the counterparty an on-chain protocol or a centralized platform?
If you can't answer most questions, assume the risks are not understood—yields are not "free money."
Yields on stablecoins come from lending, LPs, aggregators, platform operations, or RWAs—they're strategy returns, not face value promises. Use the layer model (L0–L5) to see how risks stack; recognize incentive-driven artificially high APRs; under stress like depegging, upper-layer strategies can fall faster than the underlying stablecoin. Once you master yield sources and layering, Lesson 6 will bring selection, diversification, event discipline, and review together into an actionable checklist.