SpaceX added to three major indexes: Russell takes effect June 18, with MSCI and Nasdaq next

SpaceX納入羅素指數

SpaceX (SPCX) was listed on Nasdaq on June 12. FTSE Russell (Russell), MSCI, and the Nasdaq 100 index provider sequentially revised or invoked existing fast-track rules, with plans to have SpaceX enter the constituent list in less than three weeks after its listing. Russell expects to add SpaceX to the Russell 1000 and Russell Top 200 after the close on June 18.

Nasdaq 100 Fast-Track Inclusion: a Three-Step Timeline

The new “fast-track inclusion” rules for the Nasdaq 100 took effect on May 1, 2026. The three confirmed milestones for SpaceX are as follows:

7th trading day (about 6/23): Qualification assessment; a newly listed company must fall within the top 40 by total market value among existing constituents

10th trading day (about 6/26): Announcement of whether it will be included

15th trading day (about 7/3 to 7/6): Official inclusion becomes effective

Fast-track inclusion does not require removing existing constituents (the index may temporarily exceed 100 issues). It is also required to confirm that the three-month average daily trading value is above $5 million.

Why S&P 500 is Standing Pat

S&P 500 currently maintains the policy that “new constituent stocks may not have different voting-share classes,” and it requires that a new constituent stock must have been listed for 12 months before it can apply for inclusion.

SpaceX uses a dual-class share structure: Class A shares with one share one vote, and Class B shares with ten votes per share held by Musk and a small group of core insiders. FTSE Russell previously established a “minimum 5% voting rights for constituents” rule in 2017 to prevent similar structures from entering broad-based indexes, but this time Russell revised the fast-track provisions for SpaceX.

Opposing Voices: Pension Funds and Senator Warren’s Demands

New York City’s comptroller Mark Levine publicly sent a letter to FTSE Russell, arguing that SpaceX should follow the standard quarterly rebalancing (6/26) rather than a 5-day fast-track; pension fund managers from New York, Maryland, and Illinois also publicly opposed it. Pension fund managers from New York, Maryland, and Illinois jointly sent a letter on June 10, 2026 expressing concerns.

Senator Elizabeth Warren and the Senate Banking Committee asked each index provider to submit a written explanation by June 26. The core concern is that the index provider’s rule changes effectively force passive funds such as pensions to buy a company heavily controlled by Musk, leaving passive investors with no choice.

FAQ

What specific provisions are included in Russell’s fast-track rules that were revised for SpaceX?

The “IPO fast-track” rules approved by FTSE Russell on May 26, 2026 confirmed provisions including: eligible large IPOs can be added as early as the 5th trading day; changes are made via a single-batch adjustment; the investment market value must be above the market-cap breakpoint of Russell Top 500 at the time of the previous rebalancing; the IPO must be fully underwritten; the minimum free-float and voting-right thresholds still apply, but lock-up positions are granted a 12-month grace period.

Is MSCI’s inclusion of SpaceX based on a newly created rule?

No. On June 8, 2026, MSCI confirmed that it will invoke the “large IPO early inclusion” rule that has existed since 2007, not new terms created for SpaceX. Under this rule, large IPOs are added to the Global Standard Index (covering ACWI and the World Index) at around the 10th trading day.

What specific content does Senator Warren want to be explained by 6/26?

Senator Elizabeth Warren and the Senate Banking Committee asked each index provider to submit a written explanation by June 26 regarding governance issues of SpaceX that arise from rule changes forcing passive funds such as pensions to buy SpaceX. June 26 is also the window when MSCI may become effective and the timing checkpoint for whether the Nasdaq 100 will announce its inclusion.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third-party sources and is for reference only. It does not represent the views or opinions of Gate and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Virtual asset trading involves high risk. Please do not rely solely on the information on this page when making decisions. For details, see the Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
No comments