Citi Cuts Near-Term Gold Price Target to $4,000 from $4,300

XAU3.60%
XAG6.65%
XAL1.57%

Citigroup cut its three-month gold price target to $4,000 per ounce from $4,300, according to a research note published Monday. The commodities research team cited improving macro conditions and a less supportive demand backdrop as key reasons for the revision. Analysts pointed to stabilizing real yields, a stronger short-term dollar bias, and weakening safe-haven premiums amid easing geopolitical tensions, noting that physical gold demand from central banks and ETF inflows have moderated.

Citi Cites Stabilizing Yields and Weaker Demand as Key Factors

The research note stated, "We see limited catalysts for a sustained move higher in the very near term." Citi identified a combination of factors including stabilizing real yields, a stronger short-term dollar bias, and weakening safe-haven premiums amid easing geopolitical tensions. The analysts also noted that physical gold demand from central banks and ETF inflows have moderated, taking some steam out of the rally. "Near-term upside looks capped unless we see a fresh shock," they said.

While the near-term outlook for gold is weaker, Citi analysts said there is still potential for gold prices to rise above $4,000 over the summer if the economy weakens sharply or if inflation reignites.

Longer-Term Gold Forecast Remains at $4,500

Citi's longer-term gold price forecast remains unchanged, with a 6-12 month target of $4,500 per ounce contingent on a dovish Fed pivot or increased geopolitical turmoil.

January Target of $5,000 Revised After Market Correction

The banking giant's gold price forecast has been scaled back sharply since the dramatic market correction earlier this year. On Jan. 13, Citi strategists led by Kenny Hu raised their 0-3-month target for gold to $5,000 per ounce and silver to $100 per ounce, projecting the bull market for precious metals to continue through early 2026.

The strategists cited "heightened geopolitical risks, ongoing physical market shortages, and renewed uncertainty on Fed independence" as the reasons for the upgrade. Both metals set new all-time highs in the new year.

Citi reiterated its expectation that silver will outperform gold, though they expect the base metals to eventually steal the spotlight. "Our longstanding call for silver to outperform and for the precious metals bull market to broaden into industrial metals and for industrial metals to take centre stage over the same periods has worked well," strategists wrote.

Citi's January outlook assumed geopolitical tensions will ease after Q1, reducing demand for precious metals later in the year, with gold most vulnerable to a downside correction. However, the bank continues to expect industrial metals, particularly aluminum and copper, to perform well in the latter half of 2026.

FAQ

Why did Citigroup cut its near-term gold price target?

Citigroup cut its three-month gold price target from $4,300 to $4,000 per ounce due to improving macro conditions, stabilizing real yields, a stronger short-term dollar bias, and weakening safe-haven premiums amid easing geopolitical tensions. The analysts also noted that physical gold demand from central banks and ETF inflows have moderated.

What is Citigroup's longer-term gold price forecast?

Citi's 6-12 month gold price target remains unchanged at $4,500 per ounce, contingent on a dovish Fed pivot or increased geopolitical turmoil. The bank maintains this forecast despite the near-term reduction.

What was Citigroup's previous gold price target in January?

On Jan. 13, Citi strategists led by Kenny Hu raised their 0-3-month target for gold to $5,000 per ounce and silver to $100 per ounce, citing heightened geopolitical risks, ongoing physical market shortages, and renewed uncertainty on Fed independence.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third-party sources and is for reference only. It does not represent the views or opinions of Gate and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Virtual asset trading involves high risk. Please do not rely solely on the information on this page when making decisions. For details, see the Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
No comments