ZetaChain Pauses Cross-Chain Transactions After Smart Contract Attack

ZETA-6.22%
BTC-1.34%
ETH-1.08%

Layer 1 network ZetaChain has paused cross-chain transactions on its mainnet after identifying an attack on its GatewayEVM contract, according to The Block. The incident impacted only internal ZetaChain team wallets, with no user funds affected, the team stated. According to DefiLlama data, $300,000 was lost in the attack, though ZetaChain did not disclose the amount and said it will release a detailed post-mortem.

Technical Background

A GatewayEVM contract is a smart contract that serves as a unified entry point for cross-chain interactions between external EVM-compatible chains and applications on ZetaChain.

Incident Response and Status

“As a precaution, cross-chain transactions are currently paused on ZetaChain,” the team said. “Investigation is still ongoing, and at this time no user funds were impacted by this attack.”

The team has mitigated the attack vector to prevent more funds from being compromised. According to ZetaChain’s official status page, cross-chain transactions remained paused as of 9:00 p.m. ET on Monday, nine hours after the attack was identified.

ZetaChain Overview

ZetaChain is an interoperability-focused Layer 1 network designed as the “first universal blockchain” that integrates different networks, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Polygon. Its mainnet went live in early 2024.

Broader Industry Context

The ZetaChain attack follows the recent exploit of Kelp DAO, a LayerZero-powered cross-chain bridge that drained $292 million from the protocol. This incident prompted the formation of an industry-wide coalition named “DeFi United” to rescue Aave, which sustained substantial bad debt from the Kelp DAO exploit. Since the Kelp DAO exploit, there have been at least 10 attacks on various DeFi projects, according to DefiLlama data.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
GateUser-176c498fvip
· 04-30 02:44
Pause the mainnet cross-chain, the response speed is good, but I'm curious about the attack methods.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-656cc6e4vip
· 04-29 20:55
GatewayEVM sounds very risky; how did the contract pass the audit?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-eb706989vip
· 04-29 16:55
Only move the team wallet? Is the attacker intentional or just picking an easy target?
View OriginalReply0
NoMoreRugsvip
· 04-29 15:48
ZetaChain's public relations pitch is perfect, with the main focus on 'lossless user experience'
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-03799435vip
· 04-28 09:17
In my view, Vietnamese projects are often hacked in ways that don’t make sense. I’m not lumping them all together; I just have concerns.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityTeaMastervip
· 04-28 07:54
GatewayEVM sounds like an official bridge, and such core contracts surprisingly don't have multi-signature?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketWithAHintOfOrangevip
· 04-28 07:50
The server will be shut down at 9 o'clock. The team must have stayed up late working overtime. Thank you for your hard work.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichDodgervip
· 04-28 07:49
Fortunately, it's just an internal wallet; users' funds are safe, so we're lucky.
View OriginalReply0
MirrorPetalsvip
· 04-28 07:45
Cross-chain bridges are really hacker ATMs, repaired every year and broken every year.
View OriginalReply0
TheSkyInsideTheMirroredSpherevip
· 04-28 07:44
Did the attacker only take the internal wallet, is it a protest or did they not have time to escalate the situation?
View OriginalReply0
View More