ShizukaKazu

#PreIPOs第二期OpenAI认购 OpenAI Subscription Experience Highlights
1 Low barrier to entry: Participate with as little as 100 USDT to invest in top unicorns
2 Dual-currency choice: Flexible USDT/GUSD options, with additional benefits for GUSD
3 Fair allocation: Early-bird mechanism encourages participation ahead of time
4 Fee discounts: Waived trading fees and custody fees
5 Multiple benefits: GT rewards + VIP Airdrop + GUSD yield
6 Flexible exit: Pre-market trading + redemption after the IPO + maturity settlement
Risk warning
The target company is not listed and carries a high degree of uncertainty
If the company goes bankrupt, the investment value could become zero
Price volatility risk, with no price guarantee or underpricing protection
This product has no direct legal relationship with OpenAI
Summary: Gate’s OpenAI Pre-IPO subscription experience is overall quite user-friendly, with a clear operational path. It supports dual-currency subscriptions and uses an “early-bird weighted” allocation mechanism to ensure fairness, while also offering multiple incentive benefits. Users can participate in pre-IPO investment in global top AI unicorns with a low minimum (from 100 USDT), but should fully understand the high-risk nature.

#韩国KOSPI暴跌5%触发熔断 #夏日创作营 South Korean stocks drop more than 5% as a temporary trading halt mechanism is triggered
The South Korean stock market once again saw violent swings.
Today, South Korean stocks opened sharply lower. As of 8:18, the Korea KOSPI Index plunged by more than 5%, and the Korean exchange triggered a temporary trading halt mechanism for the KOSPI Index.
A report by Yonhap News on July 15 said that after days of sharp declines, the Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI) rebounded strongly on the 15th, quickly reclaiming the 7,000-point integer threshold; at one point during the day, it surged by more than 7%.
Market analysis believes that this rebound was mainly driven by cooling expectations of Fed rate hikes and a broad strengthening of the semiconductor sector in the overnight New York stock market, along with international institutions continuing to show strong interest in demand for artificial intelligence (AI) memory chips—together boosting market sentiment. Fueled by this, South Korean stocks opened higher and rose steadily that day, with major technology stocks generally rebounding.
Notably, since the beginning of this year, the KOSPI has triggered a temporary buy-side trading halt 36 times, and activated a circuit breaker 7 times due to sharp declines.
South Korea’s SBS TV said that recently, temporary trading halts for buying and selling have been alternating almost every day, with concerns over extreme market volatility steadily rising. An analysis by South Korea’s The Dong-A Ilbo said that the “topping” worries in the semiconductor industry, which has heated up again recently, is an important reason behind the intensification of stock price volatility.
Some market participants have begun to question whether the short-term surge in SK hynix’s share price and the South Korea Composite Stock Price Index is sustainable. As the saying in South Korea’s securities industry goes, “the higher the mountain, the deeper the valley”—the higher the stock hits new highs, the stronger the market’s vigilance against pullback risk. In addition, overseas investment banks believe that leveraged trading involving Samsung Electronics and SK hynix is an important driver of the recent increase in volatility in South Korea’s stock market.
A report by The Hankook Ilbo quoted viewpoints from JPMorgan Chase Private Bank, stating: Although leveraged ETFs (exchange-traded funds) do not change a company’s fundamentals, they amplify short-term market volatility and increase the risk of overheating on both the upswing and the downswing.
Futu Securities also pointed out that large numbers of retail investors use leverage, leaving the market with insufficient buffers to absorb declines. What might originally have been a typical market correction, after semiconductor stocks fell, instead led to consecutive events of margin calls and forced liquidations, creating a domino effect that ultimately turned into a round of mechanical crash.
On the 15th, at a policy meeting held in Seoul, President Lee Jae-myung of South Korea said that South Korea’s domestic stock market has seen “unprecedented large-scale surges” in an extremely short time recently, so it needs to undergo some time and volatility in order to stabilize. For stabilizing measures, reports in the market suggest South Korea may raise the threshold for leveraged investments.

#夏日创作营 Worsh’s first Congressional appearance: six key takeaways—clear “no bailout for crypto,” opposition to the CBDC, and five task forces “starting from scratch” to reshape the Federal Reserve
Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Worsh attended, for the first time as chair, the House Financial Services Committee’s semiannual monetary policy hearing on the evening of July 14. Seven major flashpoints in an instant:
① “Task not complete” douses CPI optimism—Worsh refused to interpret a one-month improvement in data as a policy shift, explicitly stating the FOMC has “zero tolerance for persistent high inflation,” and deliberately not issuing any signals about an interest-rate path;
② “The Federal Reserve won’t do this bailout business”—Democratic Rep. Sherman asked whether, if crypto or stablecoins saw an outflow similar to the 2008 run on money market funds, the Federal Reserve would step in. Worsh responded clearly: “We do not want to be in the bailout business, full stop,” including “the crypto industry,” while leaving room: “we will do everything possible to mitigate extreme risks”;
③ “The sanctity of Fed independence is sacred and inviolable”—a hard pushback against White House pressure, reiterating that the Supreme Court has recently confirmed that monetary policy independence is protected by law;
④ Anti-CBDC stance—explicitly opposed to a U.S. central bank digital currency, saying the CBDC is a “bad policy choice,” consistent with the position of most Republican lawmakers;
⑤ Five task forces “starting from scratch”—establishing five dedicated, fully nonpartisan task forces composed of top scholars and industry experts, aimed at overturning and rebuilding the Federal Reserve’s existing operating mechanisms. The first-phase results will be announced within the year. Balance sheet reduction “will not return to the scale of 2006,” but will be “less than $6.74 trillion,” and “after sufficient communication, we will absolutely never surprise the market”;
⑥ Retreat on the AI disinflation thesis—having previously firmly believed that AI would bring “productivity-driven disinflation” to bring inflation down, his attitude shifted from “confident” to “awe.” “Right now, we don’t know to what extent the economy will benefit from building with AI”;
⑦ A major shift in the communication framework—will not commit to a fixed news-release cadence. “It’s better to be more cautious in communication.” The market’s “game rules” of “extracting the interest-rate path from the chair’s mouth” may change. The June FOMC dot plot showed that of 19 officials, 9 expect at least one rate hike within the year and 6 expect at least two. Worsh himself refused to submit his own interest-rate forecast.
Market impact assessment: neutral to negative (“no bailout for crypto” clearly stated + opposition to the CBDC + deliberately withholding interest-rate-path signals = near-term pressure from “good news already priced in”; but the probability of a rate hike in July falling to 12.3% + the reform commitments from the five task forces = medium- to long-term expectations for greater policy transparency).
Affected assets: BTC/ETH (“no bailout for crypto” clearly stated = the central bank will no longer provide a backstop for systemic crypto risks; long-term neutral-to-bearish), stablecoins (the central bank’s clear opposition to the CBDC = the regulatory environment for private stablecoins has not changed, indirectly positive for USDC/USDT), SOL/RWA-type tokens (expectations for regulatory clarity are held back), the entire market (a new framework in which data determines policy will amplify volatility around future data releases).

#广场预测世界杯赢40000U Final showdown: Spain vs Argentina
In the second semifinal of the CONCACAF World Cup, which ended in the early hours of the 16th Beijing time, the defending champion Argentina team overturned England 2-1 to win, reaching the final in two consecutive World Cups.
Data shows that Argentina have reached the World Cup semifinals six times in total, winning every time. This does not include the 1978 World Cup, when there was no semifinals due to the event setup, and Argentina won the title that edition.
On the other hand, in past World Cups, all champions were led by home-country head coaches, while England’s head coach Tuchel (Germany) is the only foreign head coach among the four semifinal teams this time. With the team missing the final, this “rule” of the World Cup still hasn’t been broken.
After providing two assists in the semifinal, Messi has surpassed Mbappé—returning to the top of this tournament’s top scorers list because he has more assists.
By now, among the 48 participating teams in the CONCACAF World Cup, the teams that remain until the end are the defending champion Argentina and European champions Spain. Statistics show that this is the second time the two teams have met at the World Cup; the previous meeting dates back more than 60 years.
The final will be held in New York, USA, at 3:00 a.m. Beijing time on July 20. This is Argentina’s 7th appearance in a World Cup final; they have previously won the trophy 3 times. Spain have only reached a World Cup final once before: they won in 2010 after scoring a late extra-time winner against the Netherlands.
Which side are you on for this match?

#ETH站稳1900美元 Ethereum Breaks Through $2,000 Key Resistance: How Much Further Can ETH Rise?
Ethereum (ETH) has broken above a descending trendline that has been suppressing it since the previous all-time high. In the same period, the size of open interest in futures has surged to $19.8 billion. ETH is currently trading at $1,928, up 5.2% over the past 24 hours. Derivatives positioning data, liquidation figures, and the structure of the long-term chart all now point to the same bullish direction.
However, there is still one key factor missing that prevents the breakout from being confirmed. With open interest nearing $20 billion, futures traders are returning to the market.
Glassnode data shows that on July 14, open interest across the entire Ethereum futures market jumped to $19.8 billion, the highest level since June 3. At that time, an industry-wide deleveraging event reset the positioning structure. Open interest measures the total value of futures contracts that have not yet expired. When open interest rises in tandem with a price increase, it indicates new money flowing into the market rather than shorts simply closing. This metric had fallen to around $15.5 billion in the late June period. Its strong rebound suggests traders are returning to Ethereum derivatives with confidence. Ethereum’s persistently positive funding rates further corroborate this view.
It is said that whale trader Machi Big Brother opened a long on ETH with 25x leverage, for a position size of $24.3 million, with the liquidation line set at $1,833. If the price drops back below the June range, this signal would be invalidated, indicating that the new positioning was only temporary.
A large number of long liquidations appeared at the 4% annual low point, implying that a short squeeze may be developing. And the recent liquidation structure could further strengthen the bullish case. According to Glassnode, the share of Ethereum futures long liquidations has fallen to 4%, the lowest level in a year.
In short: of the positions being liquidated, only 4% are longs, while the remaining 96% are shorts that were forced out as prices moved higher. Long liquidations dominate.
Still, rebounds driven by a short squeeze should be treated cautiously. Forced liquidations can amplify upside potential, just as the downside created by the June 3 sell-off was over-amplified. For this rally to sustain, spot demand must keep up. If the long share returns above 50%, it would mean shorts are again absorbing sell pressure, weakening the momentum signal. Ethereum price holding the trendline from the 2022 lows in the weekly chart shows why the current level is so important.
An upward trendline drawn from the June 2022 low has consistently been supported throughout the last bull cycle; now it is again acting around $1,600. This rebound also occurs within a long-term green demand zone. Since early 2023, this zone has served as support four times. In addition, the area lines up with the 0.786 Fibonacci retracement level of the entire cycle—$1,754.
The triple convergence of the trendline, horizontal support, and the Fibonacci level makes this zone an unbreakable line of defense. The next major resistance level, however, sits far above at the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement of $2,438.
ETH Price Forecast: $2,000 Breakout to Be Tested
On the daily chart, Monday’s 6.5% bullish candle broke above a descending trendline that has been in place since the previous all-time high. Before this breakout, the trendline had blocked ETH price from above five times, and the daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) confirmed the momentum shift. The indicator has broken above the downtrend line formed since July 2025. It is currently around 65, but there is still a warning signal: during this rebound, trading volume has continued to shrink, so the breakout lacks strong confirmation from market participation.
Analysts tracking the ETH/BTC ratio have observed early signs of Ethereum’s broader recovery, which may help fill the previously missing demand. A recent resistance area sits between $1,900 and $2,000. If the price closes above that range while volume expands, it could open room for a move toward $2,438—about 30% higher than the current price. The downside is that $1,754 is a key support level. If it fails, the move could slide back toward the trendline near $1,600. And if the weekly closing price drops below this level, the current bullish structure would be completely invalidated. Either there will be a breakout confirmed by rising volume, or Ethereum will return to that zone that has been defended four times. $ETH

#美国6月PPI年率5.5% PPI plunges overnight! The probability of a rate hike for July crashes to 5%, and Wash makes his debut before Congress promising “zero tolerance”
On July 15, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics released June PPI data, which was broadly below market expectations. Following the cooling of CPI that came in hotter-than-expected the day before, further weakness in PPI led traders to unwind their bets on a July rate hike by the Federal Reserve. However, the new Fed chair, Wash, still delivered a “zero tolerance” message during his first appearance before Congress, leaving uncertainty over the subsequent policy path.
PPI falls broadly short of expectations: energy prices are the key driver
Data show that June U.S. PPI rose 5.5% year over year, far below market expectations of 6.2%, with the prior value at 6.0%. On a month-over-month basis, PPI fell 0.3%, versus expectations for flat (0%). For core PPI, June increased 4.7% year over year, below expectations of 5.2%; month over month it rose 0.2%, below expectations of 0.4%.
A sharp drop in oil prices is the core factor behind the PPI cooling beyond expectations. In June PPI, energy costs fell 6.4% month over month, aligning with the CPI data where the energy index fell 5.7% month over month and gasoline prices dropped 9.7%. However, upstream cost pressure has not eased—prices for processed goods, raw materials, and metal categories are still rising.
CPI + PPI both fall: a signal of an inflation turning point?
Previously, the June CPI released on July 14 was also broadly below expectations:
CPI year over year: 3.5%, below expectations of 3.8%, prior 4.2%
CPI month over month: -0.4%, the first month-over-month contraction since April 2020
Core CPI year over year: 2.6%, below expectations of 2.8%
Core CPI month over month: unchanged, the smallest increase since January 2021
Housing inflation continues to cool as well: the June housing index rose only 0.1% month over month, the smallest month-over-month increase since January 2021. Structural divergence remains clear: prices for auto insurance, communications, apparel, and medical care declined, but service prices such as entertainment, household furniture, and personal care stayed resilient.
Rate-hike expectations plunge: July probability only 5%
After the data were released, the market quickly repriced. Current pricing in interest-rate futures and swaps indicates:
July rate-hike probability: down to about 5% (CME data show the probability of holding the rate steady at 88.8%, and a 25bp hike at 11.2%)
September rate-hike probability: about 40% (holding the rate steady 51.2%, a 25bp hike 44%, and a 50bp hike 4.7%)
U.S. stock index futures rose, and Treasury yields fell. Spot gold jumped by nearly $20 in the short term. The rate-hike expectations that had briefly warmed up cooled abruptly again, and the monetary policy path is facing a recalibration.
Wash’s debut before Congress: zero tolerance + AI may not raise inflation
Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Wash completed his first appearance before Congress since taking office. At the half-year monetary policy hearing of the House Financial Services Committee, Wash sent several key signals:
First, “zero tolerance” for inflation. He said that the continued inflation running above its goal for the past five years in itself is a failure of duty, and that the interest-rate tool still remains among the options. “Inflation is a choice, which means monetary policy makers need to choose lower prices.”
Second, the AI boom may not necessarily drive inflation higher. Wash believes that price increases stemming from a surge in artificial intelligence construction may not stimulate inflation; he expects AI to boost productivity and wages. The five working groups he set up will “start from a blank sheet” to review the Fed’s framework.
Third, emphasize independence. Wash said Trump has not tried to influence monetary policy making.
On the same day, William Williams, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, said the current monetary policy stance is “in a favorable position,” and expects total inflation to fall back to around 3.25% by year-end, closer to the target in 2027, and reach 2% in 2028.
Beige Book: moderate expansion for the economy, with oil prices as an uncertainty factor
The Fed’s Beige Book released on the day showed that between late May and June, 11 of the 12 Fed districts recorded slight to moderate growth. Overall prices rose moderately: prices in nine districts rose moderately, and the overall increase was flat or slowed compared with the previous period. Employment rose overall, but in seven districts changes were very small or unchanged. Multiple districts explicitly pointed out that the future trajectory of fuel costs has a high degree of uncertainty.
A look inside PPI components: upstream pressures not gone
Although overall PPI cooled beyond expectations, the structural divergence deserves attention. Within PPI components, transportation and warehousing prices declined somewhat; however, freight rates stayed elevated due to rising fuel costs and a shortage of truck drivers caused by the Trump administration tightening immigration policy. Airline ticket prices and investment portfolio management fees included in the PCE price index rose noticeably, which could support future core inflation.
In addition, the New York Fed’s July manufacturing business outlook index rebounded sharply: new orders and shipments increased, and employment indicators rose to the highest level since December 2022. Although the prices paid by manufacturers index remains elevated, it has already come down from its peak, and firms’ expectations for future prices have declined, suggesting upstream cost pressures may continue to ease.
Market reaction: stocks, bonds, and gold move together
After the PPI data were released, the market responded quickly: U.S. stock index futures rose, Treasury yields fell, and spot gold jumped by nearly $20 in the short term. The U.S. dollar index weakened, while offshore RMB strengthened. Rate-hike expectations, which had briefly warmed earlier, cooled sharply again, and the monetary policy path faces reassessment.
Wu Qiti, head of research at Yuan Daw Information Securities, said the cooling in market rate-hike expectations is reasonable: the probability of another Fed rate hike this year has already fallen significantly, and the chance of an aggressive hike can basically be ruled out. However, he also cautioned that if a black-swan event emerges later—such as a rapid deterioration of the Middle East situation leading to a sharp spike in energy prices and an unexpected rebound in inflation data—the Fed would not rule out restarting a small rate-hike.
The next round of trading: inflation cools vs geopolitical risk
The broadly weak June inflation data temporarily eased the market’s concern about an upcoming rate hike. But the stickiness in core services prices, the structural high level of transportation costs, and energy-price uncertainty driven by renewed escalation in the Middle East conflict suggest the current easing trend may only be temporary. The final decision at the Fed’s July policy meeting, whether geopolitical risks will deliver new shocks to supply chains, and whether subsequent inflation data can continue to show a cooling trend will be key variables in determining where the market goes next. Amid the tug-of-war between “dovish surprises” and “hawkish testimony,” investors need to stay flexible and closely watch every data inflection point.

#跟单日记 Crypto market copy-trading (copy-trading transactions) may look like a shortcut to “easy profits,” but in reality it hands your funds and fate over to someone else, hiding extremely high risks of being scammed and losing money. To effectively avoid pitfalls, you need to guard against issues from three dimensions: identifying common copy-trading scams, preventing trading risks, and building self-protection mechanisms:
I. Identify common copy-trading scams (anti-fraud / avoid pitfalls)
1 Beware of “high returns” and “guaranteed no loss” rhetoric: Any scheme that promises “daily stable returns” or “AI automated copy-trading with guaranteed profit” is likely a Ponzi scheme or a capital pool. Real traders don’t make money by leading trades; they make money from trading itself. Copy-trading leaders often profit by charging trading fees, taking the counterparty loss (in cooperation with shady platforms), or harvesting “greenhorns.”
2 Beware of “fake profits” and “hired shills” traps: Copy-trading leaders often use PS-ed profit screenshots, simulator accounts, or sockpuppet accounts in groups to create the illusion of profitability, luring copy-traders to chase higher. Don’t trust the “copy-trading teachers” in groups or any “insider news.” Don’t join paid “copy-trading groups” or paid communities.
3 Beware of “shady platforms” and phishing traps: Don’t trust “small exchanges” or copy-trading platforms recommended by strangers. These platforms often eat the counterparty loss by manufacturing slippage and deliberately causing copy-traders to get liquidated. Be sure to use compliant top-tier exchanges, don’t click unknown links, and don’t download “copy-trading software” or fake wallets from unofficial channels.
4 Beware of “pig butchering” tactics: Scammers will first give copy-traders a “little sweet” (profit on a small position) to build trust, then lure copy-traders to “add funds” or go in with full capital into high-risk projects. In the end, they complete the harvest through price manipulation or platform withdrawal.
II. Prevent trading and operational risks (risk control / avoid pitfalls)
1 Refuse “blind following” and “full allocation”: Copy-trading cannot replace your own trading knowledge. Don’t give up independent thinking just because you’re copy-trading. Don’t blindly add positions because you see profits, and don’t stubbornly hold through losses. You must build your own trading discipline and set clear take-profit and stop-loss lines (for example, stop-loss immediately when losses reach 5% of principal).
2 Control leverage and position sizing: Copy-trading leaders often lack control over leverage and position size, making it easy for them to induce high-leverage trades—leading to instant liquidation. Beginners should not touch leverage; even experienced traders must strictly control leverage ratios and use a staged entry strategy, never going all-in.
3 Recognize the “information gap” risk: Copy-trading leaders often have an information advantage, while copy-traders are at an absolute disadvantage. The market changes in an instant. Copy-traders cannot know in real time the leader’s true trading intentions and underlying logic. You should respect the market, trade with spare funds, and be mentally prepared for the possibility that your principal could go to zero.
III. Build self-protection mechanisms (practical / avoid pitfalls)
1 Maintain independent judgment: Treat copy-trading only as a reference for understanding the market and learning trading logic—not as a direct copy of trades. Before copy-trading, you must conduct independent research on the project, the coins, and the trading rules, and refuse a “helpless dependent” mindset.
2 Protect account and fund safety: Never disclose your private key or seed phrase to others. Don’t sign “authorizations” blindly to avoid falling into “authorization theft of funds” traps. For large sums, it’s recommended to use a hardware cold wallet and enable two-factor authentication (2FA).
Note: The cryptocurrency market has extremely high risk. Please view the market rationally and treat any promises of “principal-protected high returns” with caution.

#PreIPOs第二期OpenAI认购 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥⏳ The OpenAI ($OPENAI) Pre-IPO round two subscription is ongoing—subscribe earlier to get higher allocation weight
🔹 There are already 3,500+ participants
🔹 Subscription amount has surpassed $225 million
🔹 Enjoy dual benefits from the $GT airdrop reward & $GUSD 3.8% minting earnings
🔹 VIP users with 5+ and super agents can receive additional free airdrops
Subscribe now: https://www.gate.com/ipos/21
More details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/100622
Subscriptions are in full swing—join early, benefit more, and come participate 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

#盘前合约上线长鑫存储 Gate has officially listed pre-market trading for the CXMT/USDT perpetual futures contract, supporting 1x–10x leverage for both long and short two-way operations.
Changxin Technology’s STAR Market IPO subscription starts today, with an offering price of 8.66 yuan per share, raising 57.9 billion yuan, the largest semiconductor IPO in A-share history.
Even more worth关注 is that CXMT, before even going public, has already sparked a trading frenzy in the crypto community. On Hyperliquid, CXMT perpetuals’ open interest broke $23 million within 5 hours, surpassing HOOD and MSTR, only behind Tesla. The on-chain implied market cap is about 3.5 trillion yuan, with a premium of over 500% versus the offering price. The 24-hour trading volume is about $25.7 million. A whale address deposited $75.3 million to Hyperliquid over the past week and continues to place orders to go long, prompting community discussion about “on-chain funds pricing domestic storage in advance.” Before CXMT formally lists on July 27, the price-discovery mechanism of the pre-market contracts is worth watching.
Trade now: https://www.gate.com/futures/USDT/CXMT_USDT
More details: https://www.gate.com/zh/announcements/article/100682

#夏日创作营 Gold prices may bottom in the third quarter and rebound in the fourth quarter
Looking ahead to the second half of the year, under the combined effects of rising US Treasury real yields, weak physical gold demand, the fading of geopolitical risk premia, and other factors, it is expected that gold prices will show a pattern of falling first and then rising: in the third quarter, gold prices are likely to continue a choppy downward trend. The international gold price’s annual low may test the $3,700/oz area, but in the fourth quarter, a rebound from the low level is likely.
In terms of monetary attributes, elevated US Treasury real yields have led to redemptions from gold ETFs (exchange-traded funds), which has pressured gold performance. However, this may ease in the fourth quarter. In most historical periods, gold prices have shown a strong negative correlation with medium- to long-term US Treasury real yields. US economic data in the second quarter overall reflected strong resilience. Tightening immigration policy slowed labor supply growth, helping stabilize the labor market. Meanwhile, AI (artificial intelligence) technological progress not only boosted investment, but also largely contributed to improvements in total factor productivity.
On inflation, US CPI and core CPI remain high. At the June Federal Reserve meeting, the Fed raised its full-year forecasts for personal consumption expenditures (PCE) and core PCE to 3.6% and 3.3%, respectively—well above the 2% policy target. Against a backdrop of sufficient economic resilience and still-strong inflation pressure, expectations that the Fed will hike rates 1 to 2 more times in the second half have been building. This has not only pushed up short-end US Treasury yields, but has also kept medium- to long-term tenors—such as 10-year US Treasury real yields—rising to above 2.3%, the highest level in nearly two years. As a result, the cost-effectiveness of holding non–yield-bearing gold declines significantly.
From a capital-flow perspective, as AI-driven technological innovation raises US real rates, global cross-border capital has continued to flow back into the US. During March to May 2026, global gold ETFs have seen sustained large-scale redemptions, while technology-sector ETFs recorded the largest monthly inflow in nearly two years in May. This indicates a rebalancing of flows between gold and technology.
Real rates in the US are expected to remain elevated in the third quarter, weakening demand for gold investment and suppressing gold price performance. But in the fourth quarter, as commodity prices such as crude oil fall back, US inflation pressure should ease somewhat. The Fed’s rate path may shift to a more dovish stance, providing support for gold prices.
In terms of physical attributes, marginal declines in central bank gold buying combined with weak demand for gold jewelry are shrinking the stabilizing force behind physical demand. Over the past three years, sustained large-scale central bank gold purchases provided steady bottom support for gold prices, but since 2026 this momentum has weakened at the margin. In particular, some emerging-market central banks—such as Turkey and Azerbaijan—have shown net sell-offs. Based on monthly data, it is expected that in the second quarter of 2026, central banks’ net gold purchases will decline compared with the prior two years; full-year net gold purchases are also expected to fall. The author believes this may be because some central banks have already completed their targets for diversifying reserves. In addition, under an imported inflation backdrop, they may need to sell gold to defend their currency exchange rates, so the official bid’s bottom-support power in the second half may be weaker than in 2023–2025. Moreover, with gold prices high, alternative products such as platinum divert demand for gold jewelry. In combination with India raising gold import tariffs in May, the probability of weaker gold jewelry demand in the second half is relatively high.
In terms of safe-haven attributes, as risk premia fade amid geopolitical and trade uncertainties, gold’s hedging value diminishes. Negotiations between Russia and Ukraine have continued to progress, and the US and Iran have reached shipping-safety consensus. Risks to crude oil transport through the Strait of Hormuz are expected to ease. With global geopolitical conflicts broadly entering a long-term stalemate steady state, conflict news can only trigger small day-to-day pulse-like rebounds in gold prices and cannot generate a panic-driven surge. At the same time, as the US Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the measures related to Trump’s tariffs, tariff risk has clearly eased. With overall stability in global financial markets improving, gold’s hedging value against financial collapse and credit crises currently lacks scenarios for meaningful application, and institutions have reduced the proportion of preventive gold allocations.
It is worth noting that in the second half of the year, the US will face midterm elections, and global geopolitical conflicts may persist. If political or geopolitical tensions arise, gold prices may still experience episodic rebounds. $XAUUSD ‌

#BTC反弹触及65000美元 CPI good news has landed—how long can this rebound last?
Last night’s US CPI data came in below market expectations, with rate-cut expectations heating up, driving Bitcoin to surge rapidly and briefly hit around $65,000. However, the real key isn’t just the jump—it’s whether it can hold steadily at this level. If it continues to stabilize, there may be further room for upside as the market opens up; if it falls back again, then for now it can only be regarded as a rebound phase, and patience is still needed to confirm.
In contrast, Ethereum’s performance this round is stronger—capital is clearly more willing to flow into ETH. In the short term, you can focus on whether it continues to maintain its strength.
From a technical perspective, the 4-hour chart for BTC has already formed a rebound structure. As long as it doesn’t break down below around $61,800 afterward, this rebound trend hasn’t been invalidated. Next, the focus should be on whether the overhead resistance levels can be broken.

#沃什重申坚守2%通胀目标 Waller’s policy shift will not directly end the long bull market in US stocks, but it will very likely change the operating logic of the bull market over the past few years. The market will shift from “liquidity-driven broad-based rallies” to “earnings-driven differentiation,” and the volatility center of gravity will also rise systematically.
On the day of the hearing, the market showed a “rally first, then stabilize” pattern. The June CPI upside surprise turning into a decline—positive news—offset Waller’s hawkish remarks. In the end, all three major indices closed higher: the Dow edged up 0.02%, the S&P 500 rose 0.38%, and the Nasdaq gained 0.9%.
The US dollar index slipped slightly from a 13-month high, while gold moved in a range. The CPI pullback was bullish for gold, but Waller’s refusal to cut rates kept upside room constrained. Meanwhile, crypto faced pressure on risk appetite in the short term due to Waller’s statement that the Federal Reserve does not engage in rescue operations.
Overall, there was no panic-like selloff, indicating that Waller’s remarks did not go beyond what the market had previously expected.
In the long run, whether the bull market ends during Waller’s tenure mainly depends on whether the foundation of the bull market has been damaged. The core driving force behind this US stock bull market has been the upward revision of earnings expectations brought by the AI industrial revolution, alongside the US economy’s resilience beyond expectations. Monetary easing has been more of an earnings-multiple amplifier rather than the core driver. Waller himself also recognizes the long-term productivity dividend from AI, which suggests that the fundamental industrial logic behind the bull market has not been denied.
However, Waller’s policies will place long-term constraints on the market from three dimensions:
First, high interest rates shut off valuation-expansion space. As long as inflation has not returned to the 2% target, rates will remain elevated. In an environment where the risk-free rate is above 3.5%, it is difficult for high-valuation growth stocks to pull up valuations purely through expectations; a rally driven only by hype and concepts will keep fading.
Second, after losing forward guidance, market volatility will rise significantly. In the past, the market could stabilize expectations based on the Federal Reserve’s guidance. Going forward, every release of inflation and employment data could trigger sharp swings, and the uncertainty premium will compress the market’s overall valuation center of gravity.
Third, accelerated balance-sheet reduction will drain marginal liquidity. Waller’s push for balance-sheet reform is likely to accelerate the pace of balance-sheet reduction. This will hit the most vulnerable assets—small-cap stocks that rely on incremental capital and high-leverage assets.
Therefore, compared with the bull market being ended, the more likely scenario under Waller is a profound style rotation in the market.
So, for investors, the biggest challenge is not the end of the bull market, but the change in the logic for making money. The era when you could profit just from valuation expansion has ended. Going forward, investors must go back to corporate earnings themselves and earn money from earnings growth.
In short, Waller’s debut in Congress marks the start of a new era for the Federal Reserve. What he brings is not a dramatic shift in monetary policy, but a deep change in the decision-making framework and communication approach. The market needs time to adapt to this “no script” new environment, and the adaptation process will inevitably come with volatility and differentiation.

#预测世界杯阿根廷VS英格兰 2026 World Cup Semifinal Preview: England vs Argentina—Football’s bitter rivals write an epic chapter once again!
World Cup preview: France vs Spain
The 2026 USA–Canada–Mexico World Cup’s second semifinal will kick off at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta. England and Argentina—football’s most storied rivals—reunite for the first time in 20 years. The winner will advance to the final, where they will face the winner of France vs Spain to compete for the coveted trophy. This article breaks down the matchup in all dimensions: historical grudges, qualification paths, lineup injuries and suspensions, tactical battles, key players, and predictions for the match result.
I. A century of grudges: a special duel built from classic showdowns
The England–Argentina rivalry carries memories for generations of fans. Across their history, the two sides have met 14 times in total: England have only lost 2 matches. Their most recent meeting was a 2005 friendly, when the Three Lions won 3-2; but on the World Cup stage, Argentina has left countless classic moments of revenge.
1. 1966 home World Cup: England eliminated Argentina 1-0. Captain Rahtin protested the decision and refused to leave the field—this clash planted the seeds of football hatred between the two countries;
2. 1986 Mexico World Cup: Maradona’s “Hand of God” plus a century-defining run of five consecutive players taken out. Argentina avenged England with a 2-1 win, becoming an eternal landmark in football;
3. 1998 France World Cup: Owen single-handedly stormed through to greatness; Beckham retaliated and was sent off. England suffered defeat via penalties and were eliminated.
On the data side, Argentina holds a unique semifinal myth: they have won all 5 World Cup semifinal appearances in their history, never stopping at the top four. Meanwhile, England have reached the top four for the fourth time since 2018, matching the total from decades before. The whole team is eager to recapture the glory of 1966’s title run—returning to the World Cup final for the first time in 60 years.
II. The road to qualification: two completely different breakthrough scripts
England (head coach Tuchel) have had a notably uneven route. Their group-stage performance was unstable, and the knockout phase was tense at every step: first they narrowly eliminated the Democratic Republic of the Congo, then they overcame Mexico. In the quarterfinal vs Norway, they were once down, but relied on Bellingham’s two goals in extra time to complete a comeback in adverse circumstances.
England’s strength lies in the impact of a young lineup: they have won their last four in a row, scoring at least 2 goals in each, and they excel at absorbing pressure and counterattacking when behind. The fatal weakness is that their defense frequently leaves gaps; they have fallen into come-from-behind situations multiple times, and after the match Tuchel also expressed dissatisfaction with the back line’s performance.
Argentina (head coach Scaloni, the defending champions) have a qualification journey that reads like survival in a crisis: they stage multiple epic reversals along the way. They struggle past newcomers Cabo Verde at the World Cup. In the Round of 16 they were down 0-2 to Egypt, then completed a turnaround in the final 11 minutes. In the quarterfinal vs a 10-man Switzerland, they battled to extra time; Alvarez scored the decisive “holy” goal. Currently, Argentina have 13 straight wins, scored 17 goals in this World Cup, and are only 1 goal away from the record for most goals by a team in a single World Cup in their history. Since their opening loss at the 2022 Qatar World Cup, the team has stayed unbeaten in 12 World Cup matches, averaging at least two goals per game. The squad is built around the Qatar-winning core, and they have incomparable experience in handling pressure, penalty shootouts, and extra-time matches in big tournaments. However, after three consecutive knockout rounds that went the distance into extra time, there are fitness concerns in a lineup with many veterans.
III. Injuries and suspensions: an overview of lineup concerns for both teams
England injuries / suspension issues stand out
1. Suspension: defender Jarell Kwonsa is suspended and cannot play;
2. Injuries: Henderson’s wrist surgery has confirmed he will miss the game. Reece James has recurring injury problems and is unlikely to take the risk of starting;
3. Hidden risk: midfield core Rice caught a sickness before the match; against Norway his form dropped significantly. The team is betting that he recovers in time to start;
4. Favorable: Kane will make his 121st national team appearance in this match, surpassing Rooney to become the non-goalkeeper with the most appearances in England’s history. The right-back position becomes Tuchel’s biggest headache—alternatives are Ezri Konsa or Jed Spence. The media is more inclined to believe Konsa will cover at right-back, partnering Stones and Gey to form the center-back duo.
Argentina have a complete squad with no reductions and no injuries or suspensions. Scaloni can almost field his full-strength XI. The only rotation question is Messi’s frontline partner: it’s a choice between Alvarez and Lautaro Martínez. Both scored in extra time in the quarterfinal. Taking overall tactical balance into account, Alvarez is more likely to start. Paredes in midfield locks down the starting role with his defensive coverage. Armada, who impressed when coming on as a substitute, temporarily takes over for rotation.
IV. Tactical chess and predicted starting lineups
England: 4-2-3-1 high-speed assault + high press
Tuchel consistently uses the 4231 shape that works in knockout games. He relies on physical duels, high-intensity pressing, and rapid transitions on the flanks to create threats. The key idea is to use the pace of Saka and Anthony Gordon to pull apart Argentina’s aging back line and free up space for Bellingham’s forward runs. Predicted starting lineup: Pickford; Konsa, Stones, Gey, O’Reilly; Rice, Elliott Anderson; Saka, Bellingham, Gordon; Kane—Double-core firepower: Bellingham and Kane each scored 6 goals in this tournament, tied as England’s top scorers, and are the attacking centerpiece of the team. It is also the first time in England’s history that two players have each scored at least 5 goals in a single World Cup;
- Midfield division of labor: Rice covers as defensive backup, while Anderson provides running and progression, freeing Bellingham to roam forward freely.
Argentina: flexible 4-1-3-2 possession-and-tempo control + Messi freely links up
Scaloni’s favored 4132 style is built around controlling tempo, speed, and possession, with Paredes as the lone defensive midfielder creating a barrier. De Paul, Enzo, and Mac Allister in the three-man midfield unit control the rhythm. Their delicate passing and ball control dismantle England’s high press. Messi does not fix his position; he roams freely between the two flanks, dragging England’s defensive line and creating the space behind for Alvarez.
Predicted starting lineup: Emiliano Martínez; Molina, Romero, Lisandro Martínez, Talyafico; Paredes; De Paul, Enzo Fernández, Mac Allister; Messi, Alvarez
- Midfield tasks: the three-man midfield focuses on limiting the space for Bellingham to receive the ball, cutting off England’s attacking–defending transition chain; - Defensive advantage: several defenders and the goalkeeper play in the Premier League and are familiar with the technical characteristics of England’s frontline players.
V. Key stars: two cores that determine the match’s direction
Jude Bellingham (England): his form in this tournament is sensational. In the knockout rounds, he has scored twice in two straight matches, totaling 6 goals—he is the top contributor to the team’s turnaround from adversity. He can drop back to help defensively and also surge forward to finish. He is the absolute heart connecting England’s attack and defense. The midfield battle against Argentina’s three-man midfield will directly decide how the game unfolds.
Lionel Messi (Argentina): Messi scored 8 goals in this World Cup to lead the Golden Boot race. In consecutive World Cups, his goal contributions have broken through 10 times. Even after missing two penalty kicks, he remains the only metronome for the Blue-and-White Army’s attack. Messi’s inside-flank interchanges, precise through balls, and one-on-one breakthroughs are the biggest weapons for exploiting gaps in England’s defense—and also the confidence behind Argentina’s multiple last-resort comebacks.
VI. Data highlights
1. Argentina have scored in 15 straight World Cup matches; in team history, the record ranks only behind Uruguay, Hungary, Germany, and Brazil;
2. Bellingham + Kane combined for 6 goals, creating a brand-new all-time England record;
3. Argentina have 13 straight wins and a 100% progression rate in the semifinals; England have a 4-game winning streak, and defensive gaps keep being exposed.
 VII. Match highlights summary
This duel is a collision of youth storm and championship pedigree. England are chasing their first final in 60 years by relying on youthful power and pace pressure. Argentina are aiming for their fourth World Cup title in history by leaning on Messi and a mature system. The core head-to-head between Bellingham and Messi, flank pace duels, the battle over defensive gaps between the two sides’ back lines, and the decades of historical grudges between England and Argentina make this semifinal a classic you cannot afford to miss in this World Cup.

#美国核心CPI未达预期 Concerns about the Federal Reserve hiking rates in 2026 may gradually ease—US June CPI commentary
The US released its latest inflation data for June. CPI rose 3.5% year over year and core CPI rose 2.6% year over year, both below market expectations.
1、 Both overall inflation and core inflation dropped sharply, with energy as the key drag. In June, US CPI rose 3.5% year over year and fell 0.4% month over month; the year-over-year growth rate declined 0.7 percentage points from May. Core CPI rose 2.6% year over year, down 0.3 percentage points from May; it was basically flat month over month. From the drivers, on the one hand, the year-ago base for June 2025 increased, putting some downward pressure on the year-over-year growth rate. On the other hand, June international oil prices fell more, with the energy component turning negative month over month, dragging down the overall US inflation level. In addition, core inflation fell more in June as well, suggesting that the endogenous momentum of US inflation may have weakened somewhat. Looking ahead, the high-base effect will still be present. Although international oil prices have recently risen somewhat, the trend of declining year-over-year inflation growth is likely to continue, and core CPI may become a key force driving the subsequent decline in inflation. This will need to be monitored.
2、 Energy inflation growth slowed, and both core goods and services cooled noticeably. Specifically, in June, the energy component rose 15.7% year over year, down 7.8 percentage points from May. The food component rose 3.0% year over year, down 0.1 percentage points from May. For core CPI, core CPI rose 2.6% year over year in June, down 0.3 percentage points from May; month over month it was basically unchanged from May, and both were below market expectations. Among core CPI, the year-over-year growth rate for core goods fell about 0.25 percentage points from May to 0.82%; core services rose about 3.16% year over year, down about 0.26 percentage points from May. The housing component rose 3.3% year over year, a small decline of 0.1 percentage points from May. Overall, in June the core CPI year-over-year growth rate fell more than in May, and both core goods and core services contributed significantly, which may indicate that the resilience of US inflation has weakened somewhat and may become a key factor for continued downside in US inflation going forward.
3、 Inflation may see sustained declines; watch the downward slope of core inflation. Overall, June’s CPI data show a sharp drop in the US inflation level, along with a larger decline in core inflation, which may indicate that the risks of US inflation have been materially alleviated. Judging by “super core services” inflation tracked by the Federal Reserve (core services excluding housing), in June the year-over-year growth rate fell 0.50 percentage points from May to 3.17%, while month over month it fell 0.21%, showing that the endogenous momentum of US inflation has weakened more clearly. Looking ahead, as the base effect rises, US inflation may enter a period of decline for some time. Inflation peaked in May. The uncertainty is whether, if geopolitical conflicts escalate substantially later on, or if other negative shocks hit the economic supply side, the downward slope of inflation could slow down.
2、 The path of inflation downside may not be smooth, but concerns about 2026 rate hikes may gradually fade
First, with the US-Iran conflict recurring and navigation in the Strait of Hormuz being obstructed, it may provide some upward support to global oil prices. Combined with the fact that large US technology companies are still making extensive investments, the support for inflation remains fairly solid, and the downward slope of inflation still contains some uncertainty.
Second, as overall inflation trends downward, the likelihood of the Federal Reserve hiking rates in 2026 is declining, and market expectations for rate hikes in 2026 may also fade. As mentioned earlier, the second half of 2026 faces some supportive factors for the US CPI, but the trend of declining year-over-year growth may be difficult to reverse. June’s CPI coming in below expectations—especially core CPI coming in below expectations—may reinforce confidence in the Federal Reserve keeping interest rates unchanged. Although Federal Reserve Chair Waller said the Fed has “zero tolerance” for persistently high inflation, as we noted in our earlier report, before the research results of five working groups are released, the Fed internally may be inclined to temporarily keep interest rates unchanged. Under the baseline scenario, we believe the Fed in 2026 may lean toward keeping rates unchanged, with any potential hikes appearing only in 2027. The driving factors could include further investment boosting US economic growth, while the labor market remains resilient. In addition, attention needs to be paid to the relevant results from the five working groups.

#加密市场观察 Dual blow from the Middle East situation + CPI: BTC narrowly holds above $60k, while ETH rises against the tide by 6%—what exactly is the crypto market trading?
Over the past 12 hours, the crypto market took a roller coaster ride. In the early session, Bitcoin briefly slipped below $63k, edging toward the $60k integer level, and the total market cap in the whole market slightly retreated to about $2.22 trillion. By the evening, as the latest inflation data came in weaker than expected, Ethereum surged by around 6% at one point, and Bitcoin also climbed back above $64k. Within a single day, long/short logic switched rapidly.
Behind this roller coaster are two macro threads hitting at the same time: one is oil prices and risk-off sentiment pushed up by overseas geopolitical conditions; the other is the Federal Reserve’s shifting expectations for monetary policy driven by the inflation data.
I. Geopolitics and Oil Prices: the “invisible ceiling” for risk assets!
Recently, overseas geopolitical tensions have flared again, lifting international oil prices to around $100 per barrel. Rising oil prices increase inflation stickiness, and the market immediately starts pricing in “a rebound in rate-hike probabilities.” And a high interest-rate environment is, by tradition, a suppressing factor for crypto and other high-volatility assets.
So we see: Bitcoin, as a high-beta risk asset in the traditional sense, is hit first under the dual expectations of geopolitics and rates. This week’s “up then pull back” move in gold, in fact, has already demonstrated the tug-of-war of “risk-off expectations heating up → reversal.” Macro events don’t pick which coin— they pick risk appetite first.
II. CPI and the Fed: the “remote control” for short-term pricing
Now let’s switch to the data side. The latest released June CPI saw an overall month-over-month decline (mainly driven by falling energy prices), but core inflation remains sticky. Just before the data was released, the market’s bets on a July rate hike at the Fed surged quickly from about 10% to around 50%. After the data came in weak, that expectation cooled again.
In other words, what the crypto market is trading right now isn’t a particular project at all, but rather “which way interest rates go, whether the dollar is expensive, and whether oil prices stabilize.” That’s also why we see such a sharp split—“pressure in the morning, rebound in the evening”—from the same batch of capital as it keeps hopping back and forth between two expectations.
One overlooked fact: the “Fear and Greed Index,” which reflects market sentiment, once fell to 22, entering the “extreme fear” zone; only afterward did it rebound as inflation data improved. The sentiment pendulum often swings more extremely than price.
III. Why can ETH “outperform” against the trend?
What’s interesting is that within the same round of volatility, Ethereum clearly performed stronger than Bitcoin—rising by about 6% in a single day. The mainstream interpretation points to two things: first, cooling inflation directly eases rate-pressure, while ETH is more sensitive to liquidity expectations; second, the continued expansion of tokenized institutional assets provides long- to mid-term demand support for settlement layers such as ETH (see our other analysis). Strength-switching is never random—it’s capital recalculating who benefits more from the next narrative.
IV. Liquidity: institutions are also hesitant
Another clue worth watching is ETF flows. On the day, Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs recorded about $424 million in net outflows. One major product saw outflows of about $185 million, and another major one saw outflows of about $245 million. This suggests that even “compliant” funds seen as “long-term buy-side” are pausing temporarily when macro visibility is low. Short-term sentiment and long-term allocation are currently battling on the same balance sheet.
V. What the community is arguing about
As for the outlook, the community’s disagreement has widened again: one side treats the $60k level as the key line dividing long and short, arguing that if it fails, price could probe lower. The other side emphasizes that as long as the macro environment does not deteriorate systematically, each sharp selloff is testing the market’s ability to absorb. Neither view has a standard answer, but both remind us: other people’s opinions are just opinions—not conclusions.
Instead of fixating on a single candlestick, ordinary readers would be better off watching three more fundamental variables: interest-rate expectations, oil prices and geopolitical direction, and sentiment indicators. They determine the water temperature—and the water temperature determines the rise and fall of most coins.
This article is for market observation and information整理 only and does not constitute any investment advice. Crypto assets are highly volatile with significant uncertainty—please make independent decisions based on your own judgment.

#广场预测世界杯赢40000U The 2026 USA–Canada–Mexico World Cup semifinal (England vs Argentina) will be held at 03:00 Beijing Time on July 16, 2026, at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta, USA. This is a peak showdown where historical grudges meet today’s superstars. Both sides have a strong chance to advance, but based on comprehensive data and team strength, Argentina is predicted to have a slight edge, with a narrow win in regular time or advancement via extra time/penalties.
1. Match Result Prediction Analysis
1 Regular Time Prediction: Argentina win narrowly (e.g., 2:1) or draw (1:1) to enter extra time
Argentina’s advantage: As the defending champions, Argentina’s squad is well-balanced. They have an edge in midfield control (Messi, De Paul, Enzo) and experience in extra time. The team’s ability to turn things around in difficult situations is extremely strong, and Messi’s individual quality is the key to breaking the deadlock.
England’s advantage: England has good squad depth. The attacking partnership of Harry Kane and Bellingham is highly threatening. The team also has an advantage in fitness and physical duels. If they can limit Messi’s impact and seize opportunities from set pieces, they may take the lead in regular time or force a draw.
2 Final Advancement Prediction: Argentina advance to the final
Based on forecasts from data institutions (England’s regular-time win rate is about 39.1%, Argentina’s about 31.6%, and the draw probability about 29.3%), Argentina’s championship pedigree, major-tournament experience, and Messi’s ability in “big-game” moments give them a slight advantage in key matches. If the match is drawn in regular time, Argentina’s experience in extra time and a penalty shootout is more robust, leading to a relatively higher probability of advancing.
2. Key Influencing Factors
Messi’s performance: Messi’s creativity and ability to score decisive goals are Argentina’s deciding factors. England must focus on limiting his passing and dribbling/breakthrough routes.
England’s defense and set pieces: England needs to guard against Argentina’s possession-based penetration, while also leveraging the attacking pressure from Kane and Bellingham and the team’s set-piece advantage to try to score in regular time.
Fitness and extra time: Argentina have played multiple matches that went to extra time recently, leading to higher fatigue. England has relatively better fitness reserves. If the match reaches extra time, that would favor England.
Football match outcomes are heavily influenced by on-the-day performance, referee decisions, and random factors. The above predictions are for reference only—please approach them rationally.

# Copy-Trading Daily Log
Practical copy-trading tips to avoid pitfalls
1 Start with a small amount of capital: test with a limited sum first, and only increase the allocation after you get familiar
2 Diversify your copy-trading: don’t put all your funds into copying just one person
3 Review regularly: check the results of the copy trades, and adjust or stop in time
4 Keep learning: understand the trading logic and don’t rely entirely on others
5 Use the smart mode: beginners are advised to use smart mode, following the lead trader’s portfolio strategy completely
Risk warning
When the lead trader loses, copy-traders will also incur losses
Contract copy-trading carries liquidation risk under high leverage
The lead trader’s recommendations are based only on historical data and do not constitute investment advice
If you want to start copy-trading, it’s recommended that you first review the lead trader’s detailed data and historical performance on the Gate platform, and choose a trading strategy that matches your risk tolerance.

#加密市场观察 Why is ETH outperforming BTC’s rise over the past few days?
In recent days, Ethereum (ETH) has clearly outperformed Bitcoin (BTC). Over the past 24 hours, BTC rose 3.8%, while ETH rose 6.1%, nearly double BTC’s increase. This isn’t accidental—it’s the result of short-term catalysts and long-term fundamental tailwinds aligning.
The fuse: inflation data sparks risk appetite
The direct trigger for this move was the US June CPI data coming in below expectations, with a month-over-month decline of 0.4%. The market interpreted this as easing pressure for Fed rate hikes, leading risk assets to get a “release.” In crypto, ETH has long been a high-beta asset—when the market rises it climbs more aggressively, and when it falls it also drops harder. The same macro positive backdrop shows more upside sensitivity in ETH than in BTC, which is the most straightforward reason for the gap in gains this time.
Deeper reasons: ETH fundamentals are genuinely improving
If it were only sentiment-driven, this outperformance would be hard to sustain. But this time, there are several tangible positives behind ETH.
First, Robinhood Chain has officially launched. On July 2, Robinhood rolled out Robinhood Chain, a layer-2 network built on Arbitrum technology and compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine, covering 120+ countries. It supports tokenized stock trading and integrates major DeFi protocols such as Uniswap, 1inch, and Morpho. This chain uses ETH as the gas token for settlement, meaning traditional financial giants are bringing real assets and real transaction volumes into the Ethereum ecosystem, rather than staying at the concept level. Currently, about $76 billion worth of ETH is staked to secure the network. The more institutions build businesses on Ethereum’s layer-2s, the higher the value of assets carried by this security system becomes—this is real network effects.
Second, privacy infrastructure is seeing major investment. The Ethereum Foundation has set up a dedicated team called “Privacy Cluster,” bringing together 47 researchers and engineers to fully advance end-to-end infrastructure including private reads/writes, zero-knowledge privacy proofs, and private identity. The core product, the Kohaku wallet framework, is also being iterated continuously. The latest progress has integrated light-client and trusted execution environment technologies into the wallet SDK, enabling users to verify transactions on their own without relying on centralized RPC providers—cutting off third-party tracking of transaction behavior. This direction directly targets one of the shortcomings Ethereum previously had in attracting traditional financial institutions: institutional-grade financial services inherently require transaction confidentiality, rather than exposing every transfer on a public ledger. Industry observers broadly believe 2026 may be the key year for Ethereum’s privacy technology to move into institutional adoption.
Third, institutions are continuing to increase holdings, tightening the supply side. Institutional investors represented by BitMine Immersion bought an additional 325k ETH over the past month; their current holdings are about 5.74 million ETH. They also explicitly stated they aim to secure 5% of Ethereum’s circulating supply. At the same time, US spot Ethereum ETFs ended outflows from June in early July and shifted to sustained net inflows. The marginal change in capital flow direction itself is a positive signal.
How to understand the full logic behind this outperformance
We need to separate the two layers of reasons. The Robinhood Chain, Kohaku privacy upgrades, and institutional buying are medium-to-long-term structural narratives accumulated over the past few weeks or even months. They didn’t directly cause a surge on a single day, but they steadily improved market expectations for ETH fundamentals. Meanwhile, the short-term macro sentiment switch triggered by CPI data is the fuse that ignited this specific magnitude of gains.
You can think of it like this: the tailwinds are the backdrop, macro data is the trigger. When market sentiment turns back up, capital tends to prioritize assets whose “story is getting better.” ETH happens to have both conditions at the same time, so its upside is amplified further.
A reminder: historically, it’s hard for ETH to keep outperforming
It’s worth noting that ETH’s periodic outperformance versus BTC has been seen repeatedly across past cycles, but it has often been hard to sustain. In the third quarter of 2025, the ETH/BTC ratio surged by 53% at one point, then gave back half the gains. The key observation indicator this time is whether the ETH/BTC ratio can effectively break above the resistance level of 0.0286. If it can hold and continue rising, it suggests real fund rotation is supporting this round of outperformance. If it again hits resistance at this level and falls back, it’s more likely just another short-lived technical correction rather than confirmation of a trend reversal.