Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
#AaveSuesToUnfreeze73MInETH
This case centers around a major DeFi exploit where ETH worth approximately $73M–$92M (around 30,766 ETH) is currently frozen in legal dispute. The incident began on April 18, 2026, when attackers exploited a vulnerability in Kelp DAO’s LayerZero V2 bridge, minting around $292M in unbacked rsETH tokens. These fake assets were then used as collateral on Aave, allowing the attacker to borrow roughly 83,000+ WETH and wstETH, turning invalid tokens into real liquidity.
In response, DeFi protocols reacted quickly. Aave froze affected markets, while Arbitrum DAO froze the major portion of funds worth ~$73M (now closer to $90M+ due to ETH price movement). Other protocols also paused activity, and Aave’s TVL dropped by nearly $10B during the panic phase.
A recovery initiative called “DeFi United” was approved to return frozen ETH to victims of the hack, aiming to restore stability and trust in the ecosystem. However, this plan was blocked when Gerstein Harrow LLP issued a restraining notice claiming rights over the funds based on older $877M default judgments linked to North Korea (2015 case), arguing the assets should be used to satisfy those claims instead.
In response, Aave filed an emergency motion in a New York court to unfreeze the funds, arguing that stolen assets do not legally belong to the attacker and should not be redirected to unrelated historical claims. Aave also emphasized that attribution to North Korea remains unconfirmed and relying on such assumptions creates a dangerous legal precedent for DeFi.
On-chain investigator ZachXBT criticized the restraining order, calling it harmful to victims and warning it could set a precedent where legal firms target frozen hack funds for unrelated judgments.
Currently, the $73M–$92M ETH remains frozen, and the court decision will determine whether funds return to hack victims or remain locked under legal claims. This case is now seen as a landmark test for DeFi governance, ownership rights, and legal control over decentralized assets, with billions in potential implications for the crypto industry.